I could use feedback from readers of this blog about what they like and what they dislike. What would you like to see more of? What would you like to see more of? How well can you understand what's being posted here? What would you like for us to write about?
Use the comment button below. It's all anonymous unless you particularly want to leave your name.
If you're in NC and want help with your Social Security disability claim, call Hall & Rouse, P.C. at 1-866-425-5347
3 comments:
I'm a claimant (21 years) and I read both blogs. The only thing I would recommend is a link on your main SSA blog to the claimant blog too. I'll still read both. I'm not completely mobile, so I spend a lot of time reading, and these are part of my morning routine. Since SSA can be so complicated, I found your blog years ago, and have learned SO much that I would have otherwise never have known! So, I visit both now that this one is up. I also panic a lot, so if I hear something disturbing on the news about SSA, I will keep reading your main blog to see if I see any clarification. Of course, I don't understand everything on the other blog, as I don't have the education that lawyers have, but I've learned enough to know my rights! I can decipher a lot of it however. This blog, of course, is easier to understand though. Myself personally, a lot of the claimant blog information I already know. I think that goes with the 21 years of being disabled. Thank your for what you do with these blogs, the information is very valuable!!!
Thank you for the link on your main page!!! MUCH appreciated!!!
I'm an employee of the agency going on 10 years in the DO. I enjoy getting an outside perspective of the internal changes and policies. Some policies we are thankful for, others we cringe at the mention of... but it's good to read how the public and the representatives view the changes. Sometimes it benefits one branch (such as the DO) but not another branch (DDS). For example, the recent change to collateral estoppel allows the DO employees to process claims that should be obvious allowances that otherwise would've been sent to DDS and sat for 6+ months, only to be denied and appealed. So in my eyes, collateral estoppel is a great change for DO employees that wish the process moved faster for claimants, and I feel like the DDS employees would be grateful that we are sending fewer claims their direction. But other components may not think the same or there may be other moving parts I'm unaware of.
Post a Comment